|
8.0.2.4.9 ReductionismVersion 1.2 December 2016                        (Previous Version) Some will not accept that any religion can be rational or comprehensible, because they don't like scientific “reductionismâ€, which reduces complex things to more simple components. They think there is something more than the simple mechanisms they imagine science takes seriously. They believe the universe is somehow bigger than the sum of its parts. We need to explain: a. These ‘global beliefs’ cover wide areas of knowledge – philosophy, science, history, art and literature. This is comprehensive, not reductionist. b. Reductionism is one method which can be used to discover various truths. Then we can assemble these truths into a coherent, comprehensive, all-inclusive whole. c. Any discussion has to break down the topic into smaller chunks that we can handle. Otherwise we can't use ordinary words and sentences. If we can't break it down then all we can say is “Om†or “Aumâ€â€“ the Hindu chant that means everything. If we can't talk about things then we can't say this approach is wrong – we can’t say anything! It is a revelation to many people that science and history can now integrate wide areas of knowledge.
* * * * * * *
|
English (English)
Español (Spanish)
Français (French)
We acknowledge the traditional owners and custodians of Country, throughout all colonised lands, and their connections to land, waters and community. We pay respect by giving voice to truth, values and social justice, acknowledging our shared history, and valuing the cultures of first nations peoples.
Copyright © 2008 - 2026 Trevor J Rogers, care of the address shown on this page. All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the copyright owner. Any approved reproduction is permitted only with full attribution of the source, referring to this site and this copyright notice. The moral right of the author is asserted.
Top