Global Beliefs logo


Site Map. Click [+] to expand.  Inspect Symbol



What do you think?
Click Feedback to email us or have your say at the end of most pages.



Acknowledge coding help from:
W3Schools: Best free web coding tutorials.
StackOverflow
Flaticon
Tree Menu Copyright (c) 2006 Mackley F. Pexton

User ID: Not Logged In
Lng= EN/EN/ DEV= 'Dtop' BRS= 'Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)'
SIT= ''
A= ''
RET= '' or ''
SLF= < /EN/0_6_3_v1_5.php > NXT= '0_6_3.php', '0_6_3.php'
MVM= '1,1' '1,1' '1,1'


Go Back Previous   Quick Back   Home Top Feedback Tenets   Quick Tour   Next
About  What's New   Help Us     Call Us     Members  Join  Lost Password  Log Out  


0.6.3 How Many Statements are Required

Version 1.5 March 2013                                    Previous Version    Additional Source

We can summarise our beliefs to as short as we like.  Ultimately we might end up with a single word – perhaps something like “om” (or “aum”), from Hinduism, the world’s oldest major religion, the symbol of the beginning, duration, and end of the universe and everything in it.

On the other hand we could expand the presentation to include thousands of useful statements, that take too long to absorb and don’t help much with the big picture.

It’s a question of balance: a judgement regarding how to be as brief as possible while still including the most significant points.

·         At the highest level, up to about 10 statements seems reasonable to achieve that goal without being too much to take in at one time. Others have come to a similar number:

o       In Buddhism there is an Eight-fold Path.

o       In Judaism and Christianity there are the Ten Commandments.

o       Some will be aware of Miller’s notion of the magical number seven plus or minus two, supposedly being the number of ideas a person can hold in their head at one time (see wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Magical_Number_Seven,_Plus_or_Minus_Two ). 

o       We have arrived at 8 high level conclusions (with heaps of phrases) simply because that’s the way it turned out.  These cover the essential learnings of Philosophy, Science, History, Religion, Art, Personal Practice and Politics and an overall Vision. 

o       This is the “Diamond” level.  (It reminds me of my “diamond” credit card, apparently better than a platinum, gold, silver or bronze card – so the credit card company tells me).

·         Each of these knowledge domains can be broken down into separate topics.  At the next level, a few dozen high level supporting statements seems adequate.  

We’ve chosen 42 “second level” summary statements to justify the top 8.

o         There is nothing magical in having 42 sets of conclusions at this level, except for the cosmic joke about “life, the universe and everything” (from Douglas Adam’s “Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” see wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitchhiker’s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy) and  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrases_from_The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy#Answer_to_the_Ultimate_Question_of_Life.2C_the_Universe.2C_and_Everything_.2842.29.

o       This number could be compared to the 39 Articles of the Church of England, established in 1563 by the then Archbishop of Canterbury, and incorporated into that church’s Common Book of Prayer, still cited in debates within the church.  An earlier version had 42 articles. 

o         Restricting the number to 42 imposes a rather arbitrary discipline on the process, requiring decisions to be made on what really is important. 

o       We’ve summarised these as 42 one liners.  This is the “Platinum” level.

o       We can of course add an unlimited amount of additional detail to each of these one liners.  They have been expanded into 4 lines each, and we have called these the “Gold” level.

  • The conclusions that support the “Gold” level summaries are stated at the “Silver” level.
  • The conclusions that support the “Silver” level summaries are stated at the “Bronze” level.

We don’t want to fuss too much about labelling and the levels.  It’s just a way of working out what’s important at the highest level, clarifying what supports those high level conclusions, then working our way down to the real, evidence based level, that is the day to day substance of science and history.

Go Back GoBack Press (control) right, or click: Quick Tour  Quick Tour Next  Next