|
8.0.1 Debating the Structure Version 1.2 August 2014 Previous Version Aren’t these beliefs dogmatic in structure, style, content and phrasing? How can we be certain? This reasonable way is not just a set of outcomes – of conclusions and behavioural guidelines. The process by which we end up with these beliefs and values is as much part of this way as the conclusions themselves: Parts 1 to 7 all begin with conclusions on how best to discover the truth. All our conclusions are corrigible: subject to being improved or refined as we learn more. None of the conclusions in these pages are dogmatic statements, to be believed “on faith” alone. They are all conclusions based on reason and the available evidence, or, at the lowest level, reports of observations and inferences. The core choices we make, that reflect our values, are based on these conclusions about the nature of reality. That is what we said in the introduction (on Beliefs). This is why: · we invite people to provide feedback on where we have got it wrong; · we accept there will be an ongoing debate about these issues; · we include version numbers and dates – as we update the contents. Although we accept the uncertainty, value diversity, debate the merits of the approach, and revise our conclusions as we learn more, we can, we must, rely on these global beliefs, and the values we adopt based on them, because they are the most reasonable beliefs and values we are aware of. In order to go about our daily living as well as to make critical life choices, we must act on some basis, some understanding of reality and some guidelines on how we should make choices, otherwise life would be random, meaningless, and without direction. 8.0.1 Debating the Structure and Phrasing The conclusions we currently support, and the value choices we make based on these conclusions are subject to change. There is nothing special about the way these conclusions have been set out in a hierarchical structure, the substance of the conclusions or how they have been stated. They aren’t fixed, but are in a continual state of flux and constantly being revised. The whole enterprise is open to debate. Hence we support ongoing analysis and discussion, and seek feedback and debate on: ● the selection criteria for subject areas to consider, which are action based; ● the actual selection of subjects (in Parts 1 to 7) that may affect our action choices; ● the underlying notion, that our choices reflect our values, which we conclude in Chapter 6.1 (‘gold’ statement 28)C:\TR\GB\Dev\EN\ENDOC\Book\8_0_1.php ● the hierarchical structure of these beliefs and their related subject areas; ● the conclusions in each subject area, based on reason and the evidence; ● the phrasing used to cover each aspect of the various conclusions; ● the reasonableness of the core choices we make that reflect our values;
* * * * * * *
|
|
English (English)
We acknowledge the traditional owners and custodians of Country, throughout all colonised lands, and their connections to land, waters and community. We pay respect by giving voice to truth, values and social justice, acknowledging our shared history, and valuing the cultures of first nations peoples.
Copyright 2008 - 2026 Trevor J Rogers, care of the address shown on this page. All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the copyright owner. Any approved reproduction is permitted only with full attribution of the source, referring to this site and this copyright notice. The moral right of the author is asserted.
Top